Ask most IP teams how they are doing outside the US, and the honest answer is a shrug. Not because the data does not exist. Because getting it means logging into five different patent offices, in five different formats, and building a spreadsheet before anyone can answer the question. Decisions about where to expand, defend, or pull back get made on whatever partial picture is available, because the complete one takes too long to assemble.

Sophisticated competitive analysis that previously required significant time and resources now takes minutes, not days — and is winning pitches.

Customer: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox. Speaker: Dan Block, Director. Product: Juristat Data Layer (MCP), used inside Claude. Based on a recorded customer interview, August 2026.

Reexam data is now in Juristat. The web app leverages a filterable dashboard. The Juristat MCP server and API so you can reach it from Claude, Co-Pilot, ChatGPT, or your own systems: live in September 2026.

You draft a claim set and want to know one thing: where does this land.

Which Tech Center, which art unit, which CPC class. Get it wrong and you're not just off by a guess, you're setting the wrong prosecution strategy, quoting the wrong timeline, maybe filing claims that were worth rewriting first. Most classification tools answer that question by matching keywords against whatever art happens to be sitting in an index somewhere, and if that index hasn't been updated in years, neither has the prediction.