The legal landscape is constantly evolving, and patent law is no exception. As technology advances, so too do the tools available to streamline and enhance patent practice.

Cost overruns in IP often don’t come from a single obvious mistake. They sneak in quietly — a missed interview here, an unnecessary RCE there. Multiply those across your portfolio, and you're suddenly looking at millions in waste. This article breaks down the most common sources of prosecutorial cost creep and how top IP teams are surfacing them early.

Corporate IP departments and patent firms are facing a range of challenges that could shape the future of their operations in 2025.

Evaluating outside counsel is a crucial task for in-house patent teams seeking a valuable legal partner. While it may be easy to simply pick the biggest name firm, or choose based on word-of-mouth, that might not always be the best fit for your business. 

Competition is a vital component of doing business, especially for patent teams. Competition forces you to innovate, finding creative solutions to protect and grow every patent portfolio on your books.

Will an interview lead to an allowance? Should you appeal? Is it time to abandon? How long is too long between filing and the first office action? As an experienced patent professional, you know that predicting examiner behavior is key to finding the shortest path to an allowance, but without the right data, you’re just guessing.

Patent analytics drive better prosecution outcomes – including less time to allowance, improved client relationships, and, crucially, increased profitability.

Burnout can lead to an increased risk of error, lower productivity, and increased employee turnover.

When responding to office actions or generating IDSs, you know your current process is not working. Is bringing on a new legal tech vendor worth the switching costs?

Your patent portfolio is your future, and you want to make sure it is in the best hands possible, legally speaking.