We’re reflecting on an exciting year at Juristat.

By harnessing the power of advanced analytics and automation, IP teams can improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance the overall value of their patent portfolios.

Some IP teams interview on every application at the USPTO, while many others only interview as a last resort late in prosecution. And everyone has their reasoning to back their decisions. But what does the data say?

Design patents are crucial to IP strategy, and just as with utility patents, require a firm with experience. 

All IP firms want to be able to clearly and effectively show the positive impact of their work on their client’s patent portfolios.  

Juristat constantly strives to enhance our platform to provide you with the most powerful and efficient patent analytics and workflow automation tools. To that end, we’re excited to announce new enhancements and features available only from Juristat.

How does using data in patent prosecutions generate more revenue and better prosecution outcomes? Patent analytics can be a game changer for your strategy, but you’ve got to know how to use them.

Evaluating outside counsel is a crucial task for in-house patent teams seeking a valuable legal partner. While it may be easy to simply pick the biggest name firm, or choose based on word-of-mouth, that might not always be the best fit for your business. 

Competition is a vital component of doing business, especially for patent teams. Competition forces you to innovate, finding creative solutions to protect and grow every patent portfolio on your books.

Will an interview lead to an allowance? Should you appeal? Is it time to abandon? How long is too long between filing and the first office action? As an experienced patent professional, you know that predicting examiner behavior is key to finding the shortest path to an allowance, but without the right data, you’re just guessing.