When it comes to PTAB proceedings, which CPC classes are the most common?

When it comes to PTAB proceedings, who are the most experienced experts? And who are the most expensive?

Juristat is always working to improve access and transparency. Recently, we've made it even easier for patent professionals to visualize key data, stay up to date on filings, and produce error-free work.

When it comes to PTAB proceedings, who are the major players? Which firms and attorneys are handling the lion’s share of the cases – and who is making waves?

When it comes to PTAB proceedings, who are the major players? Which companies are filing the most – and which appear to be ramping up their litigation?

Juristat continues to build products that speed up and simplify your patent prosecution.

Finding the right expert witness in PTAB proceedings is crucial to success, but IP attorneys often have to rely on expensive recruiters to find these experts. Now, you can avoid unnecessary recruiter fees and identify the perfect expert independently with PTAB Expert Search.

Juristat is moving beyond patent prosecution strategy, creating products and features that simplify patent litigation and workflow automation. See what’s new, including our powerful PTAB Expert Search, comprehensive office action response tracking, and improved printing capabilities.

When an appealed patent application makes it all the way to the PTAB and there is a final decision on the merits, the panel will affirm or reverse the examiner’s rejection, either in whole or in part. If the board reverses the examiner in whole or in part, we consider that outcome to be a win for the applicant, since it means their appeal was at least partially successful. If the board affirms the examiner, we consider that outcome to be a loss for the applicant, since it means that the examiner’s rejection was allowed to stand. Thus, it is illustrative to consider PTAB outcomes in terms of “wins” and “losses” for the applicant.