Types of Patent Firms that Need Office Action Response Automation

Types of Patent Firms that Need Office Action Response Automation

Just because it is the way you’ve always done it, doesn’t mean that should be the way you do it. Your manual office action response workflow has been in place for years. You know what to expect, and so does your team. But being entrenched in a process doesn’t necessarily mean it is working. Your patent practice might be overdue for a change, you just don’t realize it.

Here are five types of firms that are ready for OA response automation.

1. Those ready to act more strategically

The hallmark of a successful patent practice lies in its ability to prioritize strategic initiatives over mundane administrative tasks. However, many firms are still manually preparing OA responses, meaning that valuable hours are squandered on what is essentially data entry. This impedes the progress of more critical tasks during prosecution and prevents your team from proactively moving on to their next important project.

2. Those who bill on a flat fee

For firms operating on a flat-fee billing structure, efficiency is paramount. Every hour wasted on repetitive tasks translates directly into lost revenue. Office action response automation, such as that offered by Juristat OAR, not only ensures accuracy but also significantly reduces the time required for preparation. By minimizing manual intervention and maximizing efficiency, firms can uphold their commitment to delivering quality services within budgetary constraints.

3. Those who want to improve quality

Quality is non-negotiable in patent prosecution. Even minor errors can snowball into costly delays and jeopardize the integrity of a case. Shockingly, a recent analysis revealed that nearly 12% of office action responses contain errors attributable to attorneys or their staff. This underscores the urgent need for intervention to rectify systemic flaws and elevate the standard of work across the industry. By leveraging automation tools, firms can minimize human error and uphold the highest quality standards in their practice.

4. Those facing difficult examiners

Navigating the complexities of patent prosecution becomes even more daunting when confronted with difficult examiners. Understanding an examiner's historical performance can provide valuable insights into their tendencies and preferences. Armed with this knowledge, firms can devise tailored strategies to navigate the challenges posed by difficult examiners effectively. OA response automation, coupled with Juristat’s industry-leading database, equips firms with the data-driven insights necessary to anticipate obstacles and devise proactive solutions.

5. Those with a burned-out, overworked staff

The toll of overwork and burnout on legal support teams cannot be overstated. As the pressure mounts, productivity wanes, and turnover rates soar. Implementing workflow automation not only alleviates the burden on support staff but also mitigates the risk of burnout. By delegating repetitive tasks to automated systems, firms can empower their teams to focus on value-added activities that foster professional growth and job satisfaction. Moreover, automation facilitates seamless transitions during staff turnover, minimizing disruptions and optimizing operational continuity.

Automating OA response at your firm is not just about convenience; it's a strategic imperative for any patent practice looking to thrive, not just get by. By embracing automation, patent professionals can unlock new levels of efficiency, accuracy, and quality, thereby positioning themselves for sustained success.

Ready to learn how Juristat can help your firm level up its strategy? Schedule a demo today.
Schedule a demo


Five Metrics That Prove You Need IDS Automation


New in Juristat: IDS Reference Sheets and Patent Family Trees